Starting with Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.010, California has codified the rules with respect to a tenant’s transfer of interest in a commercial lease, i.e., an assignment or sublease. For purposes of the rules regarding assignments and subleases of commercial property, a “lease” would include a lease or sublease of real property for other than residential purposes, and includes modifications and other agreements affecting a lease. A “tenant” includes a subtenant or assignee. A “transfer” of a tenant’s interest includes an assignment, sublease, or other voluntary or involuntary transfer or encumbrance of all or part of a tenant’s interest in the lease, and a “restriction on transfers includes a provision in a lease that restricts the right of transfer of the tenant’s interest in the lease. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.020. These rules apply to all commercial leases except to leases with restrictions on transfers executed before September 23, 1983 wherein the lease does not provide a standard for a landlord giving or withholding consent. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.270.
Legislative Findings and Declarations:
Until the case of Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc., 40 Cal.3d 488 (1985), and its predecessor, Cohen v. Ratinoff, 147 Cal.App.3d 321 (1983), the parties to commercial real property leases could reasonably rely on the law of the state to provide that if a lease restriction requires the landlord’s consent for transfer of the tenant’s interest in the lease but provides no standard for giving or withholding consent, the landlord’s consent may be unreasonably withheld. (Emphasis added.)
The California Legislature found that the Kendall and Cohen decisions reversed the law on which parties to commercial real property leases executed before September 23, 1983, the date of the Cohen decision, could reasonably rely, thereby frustrating the expectations of the parties, with the result of impairing commerce and economic development.
Restrictions on Transfers in a Commercial Lease:
Most commercial leases contain restrictions on the tenant’s ability to freely transfer or assign his/her/its interest in the lease. If the lease does not include a restriction on the tenant’s ability to transfer, then the tenant retains an unrestricted right to transfer the interest in the lease. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.210. Any ambiguity in a restriction on transfer of a tenant’s interest in a lease shall be construed in favor of transferability. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.220. A landlord may restrict a tenant’s right to transfer by absolutely prohibiting transfers. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.230.
Standards, Conditions and Consent:
A restriction on transfer of a tenant’s interest in a lease may provide that the transfer is subject to any express standard or condition, including, but not limited to, a provision that the landlord is entitled to some or all of any consideration the tenant receives from a transferee in excess of the rent under the lease. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.240.
A restriction on transfer of a tenant’s interest in a lease may require the landlord’s consent for transfer subject to any express standard or condition for giving or withholding consent, including, but not limited to, either of the following: (a) The landlord’s consent may not be unreasonably withheld. (b) The landlord’s consent may be withheld subject to express standards or conditions. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.250.
Tenant’s Burden Of Proof For Unreasonably Withholding Consent:
If a restriction on transfer of the tenant’s interest in a lease requires the landlord’s consent for transfer but provides no standard for giving or withholding consent, the restriction on transfer shall be construed to include an implied standard that the landlord’s consent may not be unreasonably withheld. Whether the landlord’s consent has been unreasonably withheld in a particular case is a question of fact on which the tenant has the burden of proof. The tenant may satisfy the burden of proof by showing that, in response to the tenant’s written request for a statement of reasons for withholding consent, the landlord has failed, within a reasonable time, to state in writing a reasonable objection to the transfer. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.260.
Tenant Remedies For Unreasonable Withholding Of Consent:
Restrictions – A remedy provided by law for violation of the rights of the tenant or of the landlord concerning transfer of a tenant’s interest in a lease, including a remedy provided in this article, is (a) subject to an express provision in the lease that affects the remedy and (b) subject to any applicable defense, whether legal or equitable, including, but not limited to, waiver and estoppel. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.300.
Remedies – If a restriction on transfer of a tenant’s interest in a lease requires the landlord’s consent for transfer subject to an express or implied standard that the landlord’s consent may not be unreasonably withheld, and the landlord unreasonably withholds consent to a transfer in violation of the tenant’s rights under the lease, in addition to any other remedies provided by law for breach of a lease, the tenant has all the remedies provided for breach of contract, including, but not limited to, either or both of the following: (a) The right to contract damages caused by the landlord’s breach; and (b) The right to terminate the lease. See Cal. Civ. Code § 1995.310.
If you have questions regarding your Commercial Lease, contact one of our Los Angeles Commercial Lease Attorneys for a free consultation and case evaluation.